What
is Leadership?
Leadership is about
encouraging others to maximize their efforts in order to achieve the goals.
Being
a Leader and Being a Manager – What is the Difference?
A Manager is not always a
leader yet a Leader has the potential to become a good Manager. Being a Leader
and Being a Manager is a totally different thing. What makes the difference is
the way they execute things. A manager just plans and organize while a leader
has that innate ability to motivate and inspire people to work together at
their best in order to arrive at a common goal.
A manager becomes more
effective when he is a good leader. Or is it more correct to say that a leader
should also possess a managerial qualities in order to become a good one that
executes, inspires and motivates.
Indeed, in a professional
setting , a successful manager should have both a combination of the qualities of
a manager and a leader. Both of them works with people. The only difference is
that a manager sees people as the means to achieve something while a leader
sees people as the reason or the cause from which a vision is carried on.
According to my research
there are 6 leadership and management styles, but there is a need to bear in
mind that these styles should be adapted depending on the demands of the
situation, the requirements of the people involved and the challenges facing
the organization.
- The DIRECTIVE
(Coercive ) style fosters immediate compliance from the employees:
·
It
closely controls employees.
·
“Do
it the way I tell you”
·
Motivates
by threat and discipline
·
This
one becomes effective when there is a crisis and when deviations are risky.
·
It
is not effective when employees are not that knowledgeable or underdeveloped. There
is no much learnings from this style.
·
Also
not effective when employees are highly skilled. They would end up frustrated
and not agreeable with micromanaging.
(From
Wikipedia: In business management, micromanagement is
a management style whereby a manager closely observes or controls the work of
subordinates or employees.)
- AUTHORITATIVE –
provides long – term direction and vision for employees.
·
Firm
but fair manager
·
Gives
employees clear direction
·
Provides
persuasion and feedback to motivate
·
It
is effective to use when there are clear directions and standards needed and of
course, when the leader is credible.
·
When
employees need thorough guidance on what to do, then this approach is not
effective.
·
It
is not effective too, when the leader is not credible.
- AFFILIATIVE – loves to
create harmony among employees and between manager and employees.
·
People
first, Task second
·
Emphasizes
good personal relationships among employees and always try to avoid conflicts.
·
Keeps
people happy to motivate
·
Becomes
effective when used in combination with other styles but if performance is not
satisfactory, it is not effective.
- PARTICIPATIVE – builds
commitment and consensus among employees.
·
Gets
inputs from everyone and motivates by rewarding a team effort.
·
It
is effective when all works as a team and there is a good working environment.
·
It
is not effective when there is a lack in competency among team members.
- PACESETTING – gets the
task done to a high standard of excellence.
·
A
do it myself as in performs task personally and expects others to follow
·
Setting
high standards and expectation of self-direction is the way of motivation.
·
It
is only effective when one is managing a group of experts and when there is
little guidance required.
- COACHING – long term
professional development of employees is the primary objective.
·
It
helps and encourages employees to develop their strengths and improve their
performance.
·
It
concentrates on developing the employees’ abilities and strengths.
No comments:
Post a Comment